These books are the result of research by Gilles C H Nullens. A short introduction to each book is shown below.
Main Menu
Home
- Catholics, Heretics and Heresy
- An Outsider's View of Freemasonry
- A Review of Historical Jesus Christ
- A Modern Approach to Religion
- From a Stolen Presidential Election, Through the 9/11 Attacks on the US, and to Afghanistan
Web Links
Contact Author
Last comments
3.3.2 Gnosticism
Clearly you are no Gnostic, and perhaps I am in the wrong pl...
18/03/08 02:21 More...
By Vandimir

3.1 The Roman Catholic Church
Gnosticism did not die by the end of the 3rd century. \"the ...
18/03/08 01:59 More...
By Vandimir

Section II: Religions, Mystery...
The essence of gnosticism is the gnosis. This is a persona...
18/03/08 01:38 More...
By Vandimir

 
Support this site with a donation of your choice

 
Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icoi.us Add to: Reddit Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Technorati Add to: Google Information
Social Bookmarking
 
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
 
Who's Online
Visitors: 896797
 


Search this site
 
Web nullens.org

Path >> Home arrow - From a Stolen Presidential Election, Through the 9/11 Attacks on the US, and to Afghanistan arrow 5.1.1 In the USA
5.1.1 In the USA Print

The US launched an intense worldwide diplomatic campaign aiming to recruit allies, some of them active, others passive.

Most countries agree that the terrorist attacks on the US that lead to the death of about three thousand innocent civilians was unacceptable, and that the people who organised them had to be severely punished. This attitude was a kind of self-protection, as it was believed that if nothing was done to stop these terrorists, every country could be their next victim.

The result of the American diplomatic campaign can be summarised as follow:

- Great Britain decided to join the US in the actual fighting against the terrorists: al Qaida's fighters and Taliban. This is the traditional British attitude of joining the Americans in all, or most, of their military ventures. This "me too" policy can also be described as 'boot licking' and many countries and people saw it this way.

- Most western states, including the NATO countries, offered their help but did not offer to participate in the military actions.

- Many other countries including Russia, Japan, China, etc. offered their moral support.

- The countries surrounding Afghanistan were the objects of a special type of courting. Pakistan accepted, for money and formal recognition, to let the Americans use their air space, as well as some military bases. Until September 11, 2001, Pakistan was described as a potential enemy of the west, and was politically isolated. Their nuclear test campaigns and the military coup that put the present president, Musharraf, in power, were not appreciated. Now, from one day to the next one, they became our friends, the recipient of millions of dollars in aid and military equipment. And the same is true for the southern republics of the ex-USSR, now independent: they were bought too.

- Other Arab states were also asked to allow the US soldiers to use military bases in their countries. Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Dubai, the Emirates, and others accepted with some conditions, but mainly against payment or supply of military hardware.

- The tribes of North Afghanistan that have been fighting the Taliban since 1996 were a special case. The US, NATO, and the western world in general, considered them to be enemies until September 11. In fact they were able to fight the Taliban until then because they were paid and armed by Russia. From September 11, 2001, the Northern Alliance became the US' allies.

The US, without proof at the time, accused al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden to be responsible for the attacks on US soil. They knew that Afghanistan was not responsible for the terrorist acts of September 11, 2001, but the Taliban sheltered the al-Qaida organisation in their country. Is this a good enough justification to destroy this country? President Bush, the American people, and the British, or better, the British Government under Mr Blair, believed it was.

The US did not declare war on Afghanistan, and it did not have the formal approval of the United Nations for the invasion. One must not forget that Afghanistan infrastructures and cities were already mostly destroyed by twenty-three years of wars and civil wars. The US attacks on Afghanistan is comparable to Cassius Clay/Muhammad Ally fighting with a five year old, a boy or a girl, it did not matter.

A member of the British Parliament used a similar image but he rightly replaced the nice Cassius Clay by Tyson, a more vicious character!! The US following President George W. Bush, called the invasion of Afghanistan a war of retaliation for the attack on the Twin Towers in New York City and on the Pentagon in Washington DC.

However, the US action cannot be described a war but only, at the best, a police action and, at the worse, state terrorism.


Quote this article on your site | Views: 819 | Print

Be first to comment this article

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved

 

Up to 8Mb broadband from just £9.99 a month. PlusNet broadband.

© 2008
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
www.rentahomeabroad.com | www.ecusb.net